Tweet
I cant stand the fact that people say the 5.56 round is weak. I cant help your shot placement sucks. We need some better training on the goverments end. Just a rant... i need to change my tampon.
-
Honey its just the cats, Put that @#$%ing thing away! -
Deep breath NK .... I suppose the carcass isn't mangled enough to suit some folks. That .308 is one bad mojo .... but then put a .50 BMG :eek: on the same target .... its all relative and some folks are really passionate about their favorites.
O.W.Things are seldom what they seem. -
LOL...got some sand in your vagina? It's okay....me too xD
Everyone's got their preferences, and they all think your's suck compared to theirs.....You won't believe how much sh*t I eat 'cause I won't trade my 9s in for .40s ..... ;)"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." -Frederic BastiatComment
-
Being the OLDEST MF here I can remember when the M-16 came out, I was still issued an M-1 rifle, all the Old Guard hated it as a pip-squeek round, anything smaller than 30 cal was fer P*ssys. In Nam bad ammo hurt the 5.56 rep even though it would tear-up a target when it did connect. It was not untill heavier bullet and powder combos came out that the round established itself. Still there are PPL that think any round that will not punch through 8"s of concrete at 350 meters is worthless. Opinions are like ashholes,.Last edited by kenno; 12-27-2009, 11:24 PM.The road to serfdom is paved with free electric golf carts.Comment
-
5.56 ammunition was designed to wound soldiers as opposed to killing them. The thought is that wounding an enemy is more detrimental in combat, because one wounded solider requires the attention of atleast 2 soliders/medics to treat and evacuate the wounded. I personally have zero interest in .22 I mean 5.56 rounds ;) and don't own a single round.WHAT IF THE AMERICA YOU KNEW, WAS ABOUT TO CHANGE?
The best thing you can do to support the site is pass it on to your friends and fav sites like other forums, facebook, twitter etc. Let people know about us! :)Comment
-
Hater..........Originally posted by Diesel View Post"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." -Frederic BastiatComment
-
Diesel what is your main battle rifle if you dont mind me askin. Oh and one to the nugget or heart would kill you were you stand with my .22 (5.56)Honey its just the cats, Put that @#$%ing thing away!Comment
-
agreed......Originally posted by Big_Saw View PostHoney its just the cats, Put that @#$%ing thing away!Comment
-
Honey its just the cats, Put that @#$%ing thing away!Comment
-
The 223 is a very devistating round. In balistic gel they discovered that it tumbles end over end. When the round hits a bone it tends to follow it. Internally the round causes major damage. The round is light to carry allowing an individual to double there loadout ability. Its a great tool to keep in the box.Comment
-
Hahah I call it as I see it, and ya know I'm right :pOriginally posted by Big_Saw View PostWHAT IF THE AMERICA YOU KNEW, WAS ABOUT TO CHANGE?
The best thing you can do to support the site is pass it on to your friends and fav sites like other forums, facebook, twitter etc. Let people know about us! :)Comment
-
My absolute go to round for any scenario short term, long term, variable terrain, conditions i.e rain, snow, mud etc is the 7.62x39Originally posted by neverknow View Post
Next on the list for anything over 300 yards is .308
Centurion - .223 was not designed to kill for every gel test u can find u find find 5 more that show other things. Hell it's a fast .22 basically.WHAT IF THE AMERICA YOU KNEW, WAS ABOUT TO CHANGE?
The best thing you can do to support the site is pass it on to your friends and fav sites like other forums, facebook, twitter etc. Let people know about us! :)Comment
-
The man speaks truth, but I'll still stick with smaller bores.....they're longer lasting, IMO...lighter, easier to pack ammo, and just as lethal as the larger cals with sufficient training....Head, heart, lung or liver: dead meat...it don't matter if you're using a .17 or a 7.62....but everyone's gonna vary on opinions, logistics, employment, etc....ballistics are inarguable, though...you want more range and/or easier kills, you get the bigger bore...."I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." -Frederic BastiatComment
-
Well Diesel I can see how you would compare the two, .22 and the .223(similar numbers) however, there are some differences. A .22 is either solid or hollowpoint lead with a round head.
The .223 NATO round has a lead center but is coated in copper and has a sharp point. The 556 travels alot faster then a .22 and has the same penitration as larger calibers.
I have never come across any literature that said the .223 was designed to wound. Wow, and to think when I was issued one and used it in combat I was only sopposed to wound the other guy with it. They really messed up on that one.Comment
-
Oh, shit, D.....dripping with sarcasm xD.....I really like this guy :D
Sorry, boss, but I gotta gotta give a point there, too ......"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." -Frederic BastiatComment
Comment